Global Warming’s Effect on Heritage SitesOfficial CyArk PostBy: Landon Silla August 15th, 2007 ![]() CyArk Hazard Map showing 25 meter inundation level This edition of the CyArk Hazard Map is a beta, and we are looking to improve and add to it’s functionality. We intend to overlay other risks on our map such as fire danger due to climate change, armed conflicts, development, unregulated tourism, looting and inadequate security. However we have not yet located such information. If you have access to any type of data that could potentially be integrated in the Hazard Map, or can direct us toward such data, please contact us. Please note that future additions (including increasing the max zoom from 5 levels to 9 and adding customizable “My Places”) are being planned for the future. Subsequent articles will be written to detail these so stay tuned for future updates! As we have just released this, we would welcome any input, suggestions, feature requests, or bug reports. Please add a comment below addressing your thoughts and we will attend to it shortly. (If your comments pertain to a particular view of the world, please click the Link To Page at the bottom and provide the url) Most importantly, please enjoy our Hazard Map! Landon Silla Manager of Information and Technology UPDATE (8-20-07): We have just added an additional zoom level increasing the total zoom to six levels. UPDATE (1-18-08): We have just added an additional THREE zoom level increasing the total zoom to nine levels. Share ThisExternal Link Related Articles
CommentsMarch 12th, 2008 Yurtdisi Egitim said: it seems like e very good web site but my English is not good. It would be great if it might be availible in other languages too. Thanks. May 13th, 2008 susanne harford said: archive.cyark.org/index.php australian government report of effects of climate change - good luck - great idea and map June 28th, 2010 Jehnavi said: What the article fails to mention is that the “one to two percent” of the atmosphere that is comprised of greenhouse gases is critical for maintaining a temperate and hospitable climate on the planet. It also neglects that while water vapor is a stronger greenhouse gas than CO2, water vapor is incapable of driving climate change due to its wide variability and very short atmospheric lifetime. Humidity varies greatly from one place to the next, and water cycles through the atmosphere in only a few days.
CO2 on the other hand is well-mixed both laterally and vertically and remains in the atmosphere for 100 years or more. So its effects are global and long-term. The article dismisses off-hand anthropogenic emissions of CO2 as minuscule without the common sense understanding that returning a GHG to the atmosphere in a matter of decades what nature took millennia to sequester is far from benign. www.globalwarming360.net/ Add CommentMore NewsThe Scottish Ten in Orkney - August 25th, 2010New Discovery within the Pyramid of Quetzalcoatl - August 5th, 2010 Laser Scanning St. Anne's Church in Vilnius, Lithuania - July 28th, 2010 The Story of the Tripod Rig, by Hermanson Egge Engineering - July 21st, 2010 Highlights from the Mt. Rushmore Laser Scanning Project - July 2nd, 2010 |
||||||
Unless otherwise stated, all content Copyright CyArk, 2009. Copyright Information
All Projects | RSS Feed
All Projects | RSS Feed












